Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Simplice v. United States, 18-cv-22682-BLOOM/Reid. (2020)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20200218b22 Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 14, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2020
Summary: OMNIBUS ORDER BETH BLOOM , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Petitioner Paul Simplice's ("Petitioner") Motion to Transfer, ECF No. [14], and Motion for Extension of Time to File Response, ECF No. [15] ("Motion for Extension of Time"), (collectively, the "Motions"). The Court has reviewed the Motions, the record in this case, and the applicable law, and is otherwise fully advised. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Transfer is denied and the Motion for Extens
More

OMNIBUS ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Petitioner Paul Simplice's ("Petitioner") Motion to Transfer, ECF No. [14], and Motion for Extension of Time to File Response, ECF No. [15] ("Motion for Extension of Time"), (collectively, the "Motions"). The Court has reviewed the Motions, the record in this case, and the applicable law, and is otherwise fully advised. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Transfer is denied and the Motion for Extension of Time is granted in part and denied in part.

The Motion to Transfer requests that this Court order Petitioner to be transferred to FDC Miami. The decision of where an inmate should be placed is exclusively reserved for the Bureau of Prisons. See 18 U.S.C. § 3621. As such, the Court does not have jurisdiction to grant the relief requested in Petitioner's Motion to Transfer. Thus, the Motion to Transfer is denied.

Next, the Motion for Extension of Time requests the trial transcripts from Petitioner's criminal case, the trial transcripts of the proceedings in his co-defendant Goerge Victor's case, and an extension of time within which to file his objections to the Report and Recommendation, ECF No. [13]. With regard to the requested transcripts, Petitioner has not established indigency by filing a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or good cause. Accordingly, Petitioner's request for the transcripts of the proceedings in his criminal case and those of his co-defendant's case is denied without prejudice. Nevertheless, Petitioner's request for additional time within which to file his objections to the Report and Recommendation is granted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Petitioner's Motion to Transfer, ECF No. [14], is DENIED. 2. Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time, ECF No. [15], is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part consistent with this Order. Petitioner must file his objections to the Report and Recommendation, ECF No. [13], by no later than March 6, 2020.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer