Matheny v. Inch, 3:18cv1374-MCR-EMT. (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20200320766
Visitors: 42
Filed: Mar. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2020
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated September 19, 2019. ECF No. 31. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely f
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated September 19, 2019. ECF No. 31. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely fi..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated September 19, 2019. ECF No. 31. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, is DENIED.
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
