Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CREIGHTON v. STATE, A17D0177. (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia Number: ingaco20161213201 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2016
Summary: Order Antwan Creighton was convicted of armed robbery, criminal attempt to commit armed robbery, burglary in the first degree, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and obstruction. Creighton filed a timely motion for new trial, which the trial court denied on October 7, 2016. Creighton filed this application for discretionary appeal on November 18, 2016. However, we lack jurisdiction. The denial of a motion for new trial may
More

Order

Antwan Creighton was convicted of armed robbery, criminal attempt to commit armed robbery, burglary in the first degree, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and obstruction. Creighton filed a timely motion for new trial, which the trial court denied on October 7, 2016. Creighton filed this application for discretionary appeal on November 18, 2016. However, we lack jurisdiction.

The denial of a motion for new trial may be directly appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (a); Martin v. Williams, 263 Ga. 707 (438 S.E.2d 353) (1994). Ordinarily, if a party applies for discretionary review of a directly appealable order, we grant the application under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). To fall within this general rule, however, the application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d) & (j); Hill v. State, 204 Ga.App. 582 (420 S.E.2d 393) (1992). Here, Creighton filed his application 42 days after entry of the order he seeks to appeal, and it is thus untimely. Accordingly, the application is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Creighton signed his application on November 1, 2016, which was timely from the trial court's order, but his application was not filed in this court until 17 days later. Given that he is incarcerated, Creighton is hampered in his ability to timely pursue appellate relief. Creighton may be well-served to seek the appointment of appellate counsel to assist him in obtaining an out-of-time appeal. See Merriweather v. Chatman, 285 Ga. 765, 766 (684 S.E.2d 237) (2003) (criminal defendant has a right to appellate counsel, although the right may be waived after the defendant has been advised of the dangers of self-representation); Simmons v. State, 276 Ga. 525, 526 (579 S.E.2d 735) (2003) ("[a]n out-of-time appeal is a judicial creation that serves as the remedy for a frustrated right of appeal") (punctuation omitted).

Since Creighton may be entitled to pursue an out-of-time appeal, he therefore is informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, supra: This appeal has been dismissed because you failed to pursue it in a timely manner. If you still wish to appeal, you may petition the trial court for leave to file an out-of-time appeal. If the trial court grants your request, you will have 30 days from the entry of that order to file a notice of appeal referencing your conviction. If the trial court denies your request, you will have 30 days from the entry of that order to file a notice of appeal referencing the denial of your request for an out-of-time appeal.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer