Order

David Sundy filed this discretionary application from two underlying civil actions.1 He seeks leave to appeal an order denying a motion to disqualify a judge in Case Number 2015CV1366. He also seeks leave to appeal five orders from Case Number 2017CV31A, including three orders dismissing all defendants.2

Case Number 2015CV1366

"Denials of motions to recuse are interlocutory in nature. An appeal of such an order requires compliance with the interlocutory appeal provisions of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b)," including obtaining a certificate of immediate review within ten days of the order sought to be appealed. See Ellis v. Stanford, 256 Ga.App. 294, 295 (2) (568 S.E.2d 157) (2002); see also Warringer v. Warringer, 204 Ga.App. 86 (418 S.E.2d 446) (1992). And OCGA § 5-6-35, the discretionary appeal statute, does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832 (471 S.E.2d 213) (1996). Accordingly, Sundy's failure to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures and obtain a certificate of immediate review deprives this Court of jurisdiction.

Case Number 2017CV31A

In this case, Sundy filed a mandamus action against two Hall County superior court judges and the clerk of court. On April 3, 2017, the assigned judge entered three separate orders granting the defendants' motions to dismiss. Sundy wishes to appeal these orders as well as two others entered in the case.

Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), a party may file a direct appeal from "[a]ll final judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below, except as provided in Code Section 5-6-35." It does not appear that any provision of OCGA § 5-6-35, the discretionary appeal statute, applies here. Rather, the trial court's orders dismissing Sundy's petition constituted a final judgment. Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j), this Court will grant a timely discretionary application if the lower court's order is subject to direct appeal.

For these reasons, this application is hereby DISMISSED IN PART to the extent Sundy seeks leave to appeal the trial court's order from Case Number 2015CV1366. The application is GRANTED IN PART to the extent Sundy seeks leave to appeal Case Number 2017CV31A. Sundy shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal in Case Number 2017CV31A with the superior court, if he has not done so already. The clerk of the superior court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to this court.