AYTON v. GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, A18A0835. (2018)
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Number: ingaco20180103242
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2018
Summary: Order In July 2017, Ronald G. Ayton attempted to file a mandamus petition seeking an order compelling the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles to release him from prison. He argued that the Georgia Department of Corrections had computed his sentence upon revocation of his parole incorrectly such that he should have already been released from prison. The trial court screened the complaint, pursuant to OCGA 9-15-2 (d), and denied it for filing. Ayton then filed a direct appeal to the Georgia S
Summary: Order In July 2017, Ronald G. Ayton attempted to file a mandamus petition seeking an order compelling the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles to release him from prison. He argued that the Georgia Department of Corrections had computed his sentence upon revocation of his parole incorrectly such that he should have already been released from prison. The trial court screened the complaint, pursuant to OCGA 9-15-2 (d), and denied it for filing. Ayton then filed a direct appeal to the Georgia Su..
More
Order
In July 2017, Ronald G. Ayton attempted to file a mandamus petition seeking an order compelling the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles to release him from prison. He argued that the Georgia Department of Corrections had computed his sentence upon revocation of his parole incorrectly such that he should have already been released from prison. The trial court screened the complaint, pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-2 (d), and denied it for filing. Ayton then filed a direct appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court, which transferred it here. See Case No. S18A0210 (decided October 16, 2017). We, however, lack jurisdiction.
Ordinarily, judgments and orders granting or refusing to grant mandamus relief are directly appealable. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (7). Because Ayton is incarcerated, however, his appeal is controlled by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, OCGA § 42-12-1 et seq. Under OCGA § 42-12-8, "[a]ppeals of all actions filed by prisoners shall be as provided in Code Section 5-6-35," the discretionary appeals statute.
Ayton's failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Jones v. Townsend, 267 Ga. 489, 490 (480 S.E.2d 24) (1997).
Source: Leagle
