FAUST v. ASTRUE, 3:11-CV-98 (CAR). (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120521647
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 18, 2012
Latest Update: May 18, 2012
Summary: ORDER ON THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE C. ASHLEY ROYAL, District Judge. Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 14] to uphold the Commissioner's decision to deny Claimant's application for disability benefits. No timely Objection to the Recommendation has been filed, and this Court, having considered the matter, agrees with the findings and conclusions of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Recommendati
Summary: ORDER ON THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE C. ASHLEY ROYAL, District Judge. Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 14] to uphold the Commissioner's decision to deny Claimant's application for disability benefits. No timely Objection to the Recommendation has been filed, and this Court, having considered the matter, agrees with the findings and conclusions of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Recommendatio..
More
ORDER ON THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
C. ASHLEY ROYAL, District Judge.
Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 14] to uphold the Commissioner's decision to deny Claimant's application for disability benefits. No timely Objection to the Recommendation has been filed, and this Court, having considered the matter, agrees with the findings and conclusions of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation is therefore ADOPTED and MADE THE ORDER OF THE COURT. The final decision of the Commissioner is hereby AFFIRMED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
