SHEFFIELD v. BYRD, 7:10-CV-98 (HL). (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120613992
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2012
Summary: ORDER HUGH LAWSON, Senior Judge. This case is before the Court on a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff (Doc. 23), entered on May 23, 2012. Judge Langstaff recommends that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 18) filed by Defendants be granted. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation for clear error, and finds no error. The Recommendation is accepted and adopted. The Motion for Summary Judgment (D
Summary: ORDER HUGH LAWSON, Senior Judge. This case is before the Court on a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff (Doc. 23), entered on May 23, 2012. Judge Langstaff recommends that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 18) filed by Defendants be granted. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation for clear error, and finds no error. The Recommendation is accepted and adopted. The Motion for Summary Judgment (Do..
More
ORDER
HUGH LAWSON, Senior Judge.
This case is before the Court on a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff (Doc. 23), entered on May 23, 2012. Judge Langstaff recommends that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 18) filed by Defendants be granted. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation for clear error, and finds no error. The Recommendation is accepted and adopted. The Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 18) is granted.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
