OLDS v. COLSON, 1:11-CV-116 (WLS). (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120625779
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER W. LOUIS SANDS, District Judge. Before the Court is a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed May 16, 2012. (Doc. 13). It is recommended that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) be granted. ( Id. at 3). The Recommendation provided the Parties with fourteen (14) days to file written objections to the recommendations therein. ( Id. ) The period for objections expired on Wednesday, May 30, 2012; no objections have been filed to date. ( See Docke
Summary: ORDER W. LOUIS SANDS, District Judge. Before the Court is a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed May 16, 2012. (Doc. 13). It is recommended that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) be granted. ( Id. at 3). The Recommendation provided the Parties with fourteen (14) days to file written objections to the recommendations therein. ( Id. ) The period for objections expired on Wednesday, May 30, 2012; no objections have been filed to date. ( See Docket..
More
ORDER
W. LOUIS SANDS, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed May 16, 2012. (Doc. 13). It is recommended that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) be granted. (Id. at 3).
The Recommendation provided the Parties with fourteen (14) days to file written objections to the recommendations therein. (Id.) The period for objections expired on Wednesday, May 30, 2012; no objections have been filed to date. (See Docket).
Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Recommendation (Doc. 13) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
