CAMERENO v. U.S., 4:10-CR-45 (CDL). (2013)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20130603823
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 31, 2013
Latest Update: May 31, 2013
Summary: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CLAY D. LAND, District Judge. This matter is before the Court pursuant to a Report and Recommendation by the United States Magistrate Judge entered on April 8, 2013. Neither party has filed an objection to this Recommendation as permitted by 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), and therefore, the Court reviews the Recommendation for plain error. Finding no plain error or manifest injustice, the Court adopts the Recommendation of the Magist
Summary: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CLAY D. LAND, District Judge. This matter is before the Court pursuant to a Report and Recommendation by the United States Magistrate Judge entered on April 8, 2013. Neither party has filed an objection to this Recommendation as permitted by 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), and therefore, the Court reviews the Recommendation for plain error. Finding no plain error or manifest injustice, the Court adopts the Recommendation of the Magistr..
More
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
CLAY D. LAND, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to a Report and Recommendation by the United States Magistrate Judge entered on April 8, 2013. Neither party has filed an objection to this Recommendation as permitted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and therefore, the Court reviews the Recommendation for plain error. Finding no plain error or manifest injustice, the Court adopts the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and makes it the order of this Court.
The Court also adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation that a Certificate of Appealability should be denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
