Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FEDD v. TAYLOR, 1:13-cv-83 (WLS). (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia Number: infdco20140604c32 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER W. LOUIS SANDS, District Judge. In a March 31, 2014 Order, the Court found that Petitioner Frank Fedd's petition for a writ of habeas corpus was a "mixed petition" under Rose v. Lundy , 455 U.S. 509 (1982), requiring him to "either (a) inform the Court of his desire to return to state court to exhaust the second ground for relief or (b) amend his petition consistent with this order to present only exhausted claims." (Doc. 18.) The Court gave Fedd fourteen days from the entry of its O
More

ORDER

W. LOUIS SANDS, District Judge.

In a March 31, 2014 Order, the Court found that Petitioner Frank Fedd's petition for a writ of habeas corpus was a "mixed petition" under Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509 (1982), requiring him to "either (a) inform the Court of his desire to return to state court to exhaust the second ground for relief or (b) amend his petition consistent with this order to present only exhausted claims." (Doc. 18.) The Court gave Fedd fourteen days from the entry of its Order to choose an option. To date, however, Fedd has not responded to the Court's Order. Therefore, within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order, Fedd shall show cause why his petition should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If Fedd fails to timely comply with this Order, his Complaint may be dismissed without further notice or proceeding.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer