PETTIFORD v. U.S., 7:07-CR-3-002 (HL) (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20140801f82
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER HUGH LAWSON, Senior District Judge. Before the Court are the Recommendation (Doc. 78) of the United States Magistrate Judge that Petitioner's Motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (Doc. 77) be denied. Petitioner has not filed an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation for clear error and, finding none, accepts and adopts it in full. The Court finds that Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing that he has be
Summary: ORDER HUGH LAWSON, Senior District Judge. Before the Court are the Recommendation (Doc. 78) of the United States Magistrate Judge that Petitioner's Motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (Doc. 77) be denied. Petitioner has not filed an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation for clear error and, finding none, accepts and adopts it in full. The Court finds that Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing that he has bee..
More
ORDER
HUGH LAWSON, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court are the Recommendation (Doc. 78) of the United States Magistrate Judge that Petitioner's Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (Doc. 77) be denied. Petitioner has not filed an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation for clear error and, finding none, accepts and adopts it in full.
The Court finds that Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing that he has been denied a constitutional right, and a certificate of appealability is therefore denied. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
