RICHARDSON v. McCARTHY, 3:13-CV-95 (CDL). (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20150304b71
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER CLAY D. LAND , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff was a scientist at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. She brought claims against the EPA and its administrator, Gina McCarthy, alleging that her superiors at the EPA discriminated against her based on her gender and then retaliated against her for reporting the discrimination. Defendants seek summary judgment. Having thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs, the Court finds that genuine fact disputes exist on all of Plaintiff
Summary: ORDER CLAY D. LAND , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff was a scientist at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. She brought claims against the EPA and its administrator, Gina McCarthy, alleging that her superiors at the EPA discriminated against her based on her gender and then retaliated against her for reporting the discrimination. Defendants seek summary judgment. Having thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs, the Court finds that genuine fact disputes exist on all of Plaintiff'..
More
ORDER
CLAY D. LAND, Chief District Judge.
Plaintiff was a scientist at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. She brought claims against the EPA and its administrator, Gina McCarthy, alleging that her superiors at the EPA discriminated against her based on her gender and then retaliated against her for reporting the discrimination. Defendants seek summary judgment. Having thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs, the Court finds that genuine fact disputes exist on all of Plaintiff's claims. Accordingly, Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 28) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
