FLATAU v. SHERMAN FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC, 5:14-CV-245(MTT). (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20160111644
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2016
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL , District Judge . The Court entered an Order on December 14, 2015, holding that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine barred the Plaintiffs' claims against the Sherman Defendants, Atlas Acquisitions LLC, and Arrow Financial Services LLC. (Doc. 81). In so holding, the Court granted the Sherman Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 20) and Atlas's motion to dismiss (Doc. 21) but permitted the Plaintiffs 14 days to raise new arguments that the claims against Arrow, who had not
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL , District Judge . The Court entered an Order on December 14, 2015, holding that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine barred the Plaintiffs' claims against the Sherman Defendants, Atlas Acquisitions LLC, and Arrow Financial Services LLC. (Doc. 81). In so holding, the Court granted the Sherman Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 20) and Atlas's motion to dismiss (Doc. 21) but permitted the Plaintiffs 14 days to raise new arguments that the claims against Arrow, who had not y..
More
ORDER
MARC T. TREADWELL, District Judge.
The Court entered an Order on December 14, 2015, holding that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine barred the Plaintiffs' claims against the Sherman Defendants, Atlas Acquisitions LLC, and Arrow Financial Services LLC. (Doc. 81). In so holding, the Court granted the Sherman Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 20) and Atlas's motion to dismiss (Doc. 21) but permitted the Plaintiffs 14 days to raise new arguments that the claims against Arrow, who had not yet moved to dismiss, are not barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. The Court stated that "absent any new meritorious arguments, the Court will dismiss Arrow." (Doc. 81 at 16). The Plaintiffs have not provided the Court with any new arguments. Accordingly, Arrow is DISMISSED as a Defendant.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
