Barnes v. Bryson, 3:15-cv-70 (CAR). (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20160428945
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE HABEAS CORPUS 28 U.S.C. 2254 C. ASHLEY ROYAL , District Judge . Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 19] to grant Respondent's Motion to Dismiss and dismiss Petitioner's petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 as untimely. Petitioner has filed an Objection to the Recommendation [Doc. 20]. In his Objection, Petitioner simply restates argumen
Summary: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE HABEAS CORPUS 28 U.S.C. 2254 C. ASHLEY ROYAL , District Judge . Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 19] to grant Respondent's Motion to Dismiss and dismiss Petitioner's petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 as untimely. Petitioner has filed an Objection to the Recommendation [Doc. 20]. In his Objection, Petitioner simply restates argument..
More
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
HABEAS CORPUS 28 U.S.C. § 2254
C. ASHLEY ROYAL, District Judge.
Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 19] to grant Respondent's Motion to Dismiss and dismiss Petitioner's petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 as untimely. Petitioner has filed an Objection to the Recommendation [Doc. 20]. In his Objection, Petitioner simply restates arguments he raised in his response to the Motion to Dismiss and which have been thoroughly addressed in the Recommendation. This Court has fully considered the record in this case and made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which Petitioner objects. Having done so, the Court finds the Objection to be without merit.
Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. 19] is HEREBY ADOPTED AND MADE THE ORDER OF THE COURT. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 11] is GRANTED, and Petitioner's Petition is DISMISSED. Additionally, because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
