Rodriguez v. Bryson, 5:17-CV-10 (MTT). (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20180322c66
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL , District Judge . Plaintiff Hjalmar Rodriguez, Jr. has filed an "Objection/Response" to United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle's Order (Doc. 106) denying his motion to appoint counsel (Doc. 95). Doc. 112. The Court construes this as an objection pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a). The Court has considered the objection and finds Rodriguez has not established that the Magistrate Judge's rulings were clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL , District Judge . Plaintiff Hjalmar Rodriguez, Jr. has filed an "Objection/Response" to United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle's Order (Doc. 106) denying his motion to appoint counsel (Doc. 95). Doc. 112. The Court construes this as an objection pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a). The Court has considered the objection and finds Rodriguez has not established that the Magistrate Judge's rulings were clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See ..
More
ORDER
MARC T. TREADWELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Hjalmar Rodriguez, Jr. has filed an "Objection/Response" to United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle's Order (Doc. 106) denying his motion to appoint counsel (Doc. 95). Doc. 112. The Court construes this as an objection pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a). The Court has considered the objection and finds Rodriguez has not established that the Magistrate Judge's rulings were clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) ("A [district court may reconsider any pretrial matter . . . where it has been shown that the magistrate judge's order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law."). Accordingly, Rodriguez's objection (Doc. 112) is REJECTED and the Magistrate Judge's Order (Doc. 106) is AFFIRMED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
