ORDER ON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

TILMAN E. SELF, III, District Judge.

Before the Court for consideration is the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. 24] that Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement, Fourteenth Amendment, and Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act ("RLUIPA") claims against Defendants Bryson, McCloud, Chapman, Bishop, Powell, Logan, Caldwell, Williams, and Davis be allowed to proceed. [Doc. 24, at 1]. In all other respects, the United States Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment due process claim against Defendants Warden Stanley Williams and Unit Manager Smokes, his Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to a serious medical need claims, and Defendants Owens, Butts, and Young be dismissed without prejudice. [Id. at 2].

On November 17, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Object [Doc. 36] in which he objects to the dismissal of his Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical need claims against Defendants Adair, Butts, Burnside, Chapman, Lewis, and Caldwell. Having considered the Recommendation [Doc. 24] and Motion for Objection [Doc. 36] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court finds Plaintiff's objections fail to overcome the Magistrate Judge's reasoning that his Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical need claims should be dismissed. Further, Plaintiff's argument in his objection that "defendants were `hostile and dismissive'" fails to satisfy the objective prong mandated in Farrow v. West, 320 F.3d. 1235 (11th Cir. 2003)1 and is unpersuasive to implicate Eighth Amendment standards. [Doc. 36, at 1]. Therefore, this Court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and MAKES IT THE ORDER OF THE COURT. For the reasons stated in the United State Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. 24], Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment medical indifference claim and Defendants Adair, Butts, Burnside, Chapman, Lewis, and Caldwell in connection with said claim are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Pursuant to the Recommendation [Doc. 24] of the United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff may proceed with his Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Claims against Defendants Bryson, McCloud, Chapman, Bishop, Powell, Logan, Caldwell, Williams, and Davis; his Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim against Defendants Bryson, McCloud, Chapman, Bishop, Powell, Logan, Caldwell, Williams, and Davis; and his RLUIPA claims against Defendants Bryson, McCloud, Chapman, Bishop, Powell, Logan, Caldwell, Williams, and Davis.

However, notwithstanding Plaintiff's objection, Plaintiff's First Amendment access to courts claims, Eighth Amendment indifference to serious medical need claims2, and Fourteenth Amendment due process claims against Defendant Warden William Stanley and Unit Manager Stokes are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Lastly, for the reasons stated in the United State Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. 24] Defendants Owens, Butts, and Young are HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.