Youngblood-West v. Aflac Incorporated, 4:18-CV-83 (CDL). (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20181115a33
Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 14, 2018
Summary: ORDER CLAY D. LAND , Chief District Judge . The Court established a redaction protocol for the parties' filings in this action. See Order (Sept. 7, 2018), ECF No. 59; Order (Sept. 18, 2018), ECF No. 65. Defendants have complied with the protocol and requested redactions. Plaintiff has not requested redactions, presumably because Plaintiff does not think that anything should be redacted. The Court has attached hereto as Exhibit A redacted copies of the parties' filings subsequent to the da
Summary: ORDER CLAY D. LAND , Chief District Judge . The Court established a redaction protocol for the parties' filings in this action. See Order (Sept. 7, 2018), ECF No. 59; Order (Sept. 18, 2018), ECF No. 65. Defendants have complied with the protocol and requested redactions. Plaintiff has not requested redactions, presumably because Plaintiff does not think that anything should be redacted. The Court has attached hereto as Exhibit A redacted copies of the parties' filings subsequent to the dat..
More
ORDER
CLAY D. LAND, Chief District Judge.
The Court established a redaction protocol for the parties' filings in this action. See Order (Sept. 7, 2018), ECF No. 59; Order (Sept. 18, 2018), ECF No. 65. Defendants have complied with the protocol and requested redactions. Plaintiff has not requested redactions, presumably because Plaintiff does not think that anything should be redacted. The Court has attached hereto as Exhibit A redacted copies of the parties' filings subsequent to the date of the Court's redaction protocol order, which have not been previously filed on the public docket in redacted form. The Clerk shall docket this order along with the attachments to this order, collectively labeled as Exhibit A, on the public docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
