Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IN RE BOGAN, 11-77196-MHM (2012)

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia Number: inbco20120626b19 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2012
Summary: DISMISSAL ORDER MARGARET H. MURPHY, Bankruptcy Judge. On February 21, 2012, the United States Trustee filed a Motion to Dismiss Case for Cause (Doc. No. 32) (the "Motion"), seeking entry of an order dismissing this chapter 7 case based, inter alia, on the failure of the putative Debtor, James DeMarco Bogan, to sign the petition, schedules, and statement of financial affairs, to appear and submit to examination at the section 341 meeting of creditors, and to provide a copy of his most recen
More

DISMISSAL ORDER

MARGARET H. MURPHY, Bankruptcy Judge.

On February 21, 2012, the United States Trustee filed a Motion to Dismiss Case for Cause (Doc. No. 32) (the "Motion"), seeking entry of an order dismissing this chapter 7 case based, inter alia, on the failure of the putative Debtor, James DeMarco Bogan, to sign the petition, schedules, and statement of financial affairs, to appear and submit to examination at the section 341 meeting of creditors, and to provide a copy of his most recent federal income tax return to the chapter 7 trustee. On February 23, 2012, an Order and Notice of Hearing and Deadline to Object to Motion to Dismiss was entered [Doc. No. 33], requiring any objections to the Motion to be filed in writing on or before March 13, 2012, failing which the requested relief could be granted without further notice or hearing. The Order and Notice was served upon Debtor, creditors and other parties in interest in accordance with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2002(a) (Doc. No. 34); no objections to the Motion have been filed. Nevertheless, on March 19, 2012, a second Order and Notice was entered scheduling a reset hearing on the Motion for April 17, 2012. That Order and Notice was likewise served on Debtor, creditors and other parties in interest in accordance with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2002(a), and the reset hearing took place as scheduled April 17, 2012. The only appearance at the hearing was by James H. Morawetz as counsel for the United States Trustee.

This case commenced September 1, 2011, with the filing of a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code (Doc. No. 1) (the "Petition"). The Petition was signed by Gwendolyn Kay Humphrey as "POA for James DeMarco Bogan." Attached to the Petition is an undated "Power of Attorney," which purports to have been signed by James Bogan (not James DeMarco Bogan, the name of the putative debtor), granting authority to Gwendolyn Kay Humphrey "to handle all of my legal affairs." However, the document goes on to refer to the "legal affairs" at issue as "concerning my home at 3445 Herschel rd. (sic) in Colledge (sic) Park, Ga. 30337 which is also involved in a civil action filed as case no 1:10-cv-01426-TWT and appeal no. 10-14154-C," and to state that Ms. Humphrey "will also have power to be my legal council (sic) with any and all matters with the SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY." The Power of Attorney does not specifically authorize Ms. Humphrey to file a bankruptcy petition on Debtor's behalf, nor does it contain any language to suggest that it was executed in contemplation of a bankruptcy filing.

"[A]n attorney-in-fact may commence a bankruptcy case on behalf of a debtor so long as: (1) the debtor qualifies as a debtor under 11 U.S.C. § 109, (2) the commencement of a bankruptcy case is within the scope of authority granted to the attorney-in-fact, and (3) such action by the attorney-in-fact does not constitute the practice of law." In re O'Connor, 2009 WL 1616105, *2 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2009), citing In re Curtis, 262 B.R. 619, 622 (Bankr. D.Vt. 2001), and In re Hurt, 234 B.R. 1, 2 (Bankr. D.N.H. 1999). The filing of a bankruptcy petition on Debtor's behalf does not appear to be within the scope of authority granted to Ms. Humphrey by the Power of Attorney attached to the Petition in this case. Nothing in the record suggests that Ms. Humphrey is a licensed attorney, and unless she is, Debtor obviously cannot authorize her to act as his legal counsel in the DeKalb County Superior Court or anywhere else in this state.1 Accordingly, based on the inadequacy of the Power of Attorney to support the filing of the Petition, as well as Debtor's failure to oppose the Motion, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Motion is granted: This case is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. In addition to signing the Petition as Debtor's attorney-in-fact, Ms. Humphreys has also signed in that capacity virtually all of the other documents filed in this case that purport to have been filed on Debtor's behalf, including his Statement of Financial Affairs [Doc. No. 1], his bankruptcy schedules [Doc. No. 11], his Pro Se Affidavit to Accompany Petition for Order of Relief [Doc. No. 2], and his Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Doc. No. 5]. Each of these documents purports to have been signed under penalty of perjury. Even assuming it may be permissible under certain circumstances for a debtor to authorize another person to sign a bankruptcy petition on his behalf, nothing appears to authorize another person to offer sworn testimony on a debtor's behalf as his surrogate.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer