BROOKS v. U.S., 3:01-cr-06-MEF. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20130610976
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 07, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2013
Summary: ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. On May 6, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #868) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The 2255 motions (Doc. #853 & #862) are DENIED and this case is DISMISSED, as Brook
Summary: ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. On May 6, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #868) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The 2255 motions (Doc. #853 & #862) are DENIED and this case is DISMISSED, as Brooks..
More
ORDER
MARK E. FULLER, District Judge.
On May 6, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #868) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. The § 2255 motions (Doc. #853 & #862) are DENIED and this case is DISMISSED, as Brooks has failed to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider a successive § 2255 motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
