Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. TOUCHSTONE, 3:00-CR-028-MEF. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia Number: infdco20130702a86 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 01, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 01, 2013
Summary: ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. On May 8, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #233) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. Touchstone's Rule 60 motion (Doc. #194) and his 2255 motions (Doc. #194 & #228) are
More

ORDER

MARK E. FULLER, District Judge.

On May 8, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #233) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the

ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:

1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.

2. Touchstone's Rule 60 motion (Doc. #194) and his § 2255 motions (Doc. #194 & #228) are DENIED and this case is DISMISSED, as Touchstone has failed to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of appeals authorizing this court to consider a successive § 2255 motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer