Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MULLINS v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, 1:11-CV-2487-TWT-ECS (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia Number: infdco20130730d74 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2013
Summary: FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE E. CLAYTON SCOFIELD, III, Magistrate Judge. The Court having been advised by counsel for Syndicated Office Systems, Inc., the sole Defendant remaining in this matter, that the parties have reached a settlement, IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. 1 The Court retains complete jurisdiction to vacate this order and to re-open the action upon cause shown within ninety (90) days from this date that se
More

FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

E. CLAYTON SCOFIELD, III, Magistrate Judge.

The Court having been advised by counsel for Syndicated Office Systems, Inc., the sole Defendant remaining in this matter, that the parties have reached a settlement,

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED.1 The Court retains complete jurisdiction to vacate this order and to re-open the action upon cause shown within ninety (90) days from this date that settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary. The parties may also file a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice during this time.

There being no more claims to adjudicate, the Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the reference to the undersigned magistrate judge.

SO REPORTED AND RECOMMENDED.

FootNotes


1. Administrative closing is a docket-control device used by the Court for statistical purposes. It does not affect the Court's jurisdiction over the case or the rights of the parties. Time will not accrue toward case filing deadlines or statutory limitation periods while the case is administratively closed.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer