U.S. v. DIXON, 1:12-CR-205-0DE-ECS. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20130904985
Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2013
Summary: ORDER ORINDA D. EVANS, District Judge. This criminal case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge E. Clayton Scofield III filed July 29, 2013 [Doc. 149]. No objections have been filed. In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Mr. Floyd's motion to suppress statements be denied and that Mr. Floyd's motion to suppress cell phone evidence be denied as moot. Regarding Mr. Dixon's motions, the Magistrate Judge recommends
Summary: ORDER ORINDA D. EVANS, District Judge. This criminal case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge E. Clayton Scofield III filed July 29, 2013 [Doc. 149]. No objections have been filed. In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Mr. Floyd's motion to suppress statements be denied and that Mr. Floyd's motion to suppress cell phone evidence be denied as moot. Regarding Mr. Dixon's motions, the Magistrate Judge recommends t..
More
ORDER
ORINDA D. EVANS, District Judge.
This criminal case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge E. Clayton Scofield III filed July 29, 2013 [Doc. 149]. No objections have been filed.
In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Mr. Floyd's motion to suppress statements be denied and that Mr. Floyd's motion to suppress cell phone evidence be denied as moot. Regarding Mr. Dixon's motions, the Magistrate Judge recommends that his motion to suppress post-arrest statements be denied, and the Magistrate Judge will issue a separate Report and Recommendation regarding Mr. Dixon's motion to suppress evidence from a cell phone.
The Court having read and considered the Report and Recommendation and noting the absence of any objections, it is hereby adopted as the opinion and order of the Court. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, Mr. Floyd's motion to suppress statements [Doc. 79] is DENIED and Mr. Floyd's motion to suppress cell phone evidence [Doc. 92] is DENIED AS MOOT. Mr. Dixon's motion to suppress post-arrest statements [Doc. 57] is DENIED, and the Magistrate Judge will issue a separate Report and Recommendation regarding Mr. Dixon's motion to suppress evidence from a cell phone.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
