U.S. v. ROJAS-COYOTL, 1:13-cr-0128-AT-AJB-1. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20140514c25
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 13, 2014
Latest Update: May 13, 2014
Summary: ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. This case is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. 119]. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 59] and Motion to Suppress Identifications [Doc. 90] be denied. The Magistrate Judge also recommends that the Government's unopposed Motion to Dismiss Count Seven [Doc. 101] as to Defendant Rojas-Coyotl be granted. The Court notes that no objections have been filed in r
Summary: ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. This case is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. 119]. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 59] and Motion to Suppress Identifications [Doc. 90] be denied. The Magistrate Judge also recommends that the Government's unopposed Motion to Dismiss Count Seven [Doc. 101] as to Defendant Rojas-Coyotl be granted. The Court notes that no objections have been filed in re..
More
ORDER
AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge.
This case is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. 119]. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 59] and Motion to Suppress Identifications [Doc. 90] be denied. The Magistrate Judge also recommends that the Government's unopposed Motion to Dismiss Count Seven [Doc. 101] as to Defendant Rojas-Coyotl be granted.
The Court notes that no objections have been filed in response to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) the Court has reviewed the Magistrate's Recommendation for clear error, and finds none. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of this Court.
For the reasons stated in the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, the Court DENIES Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 59] and Motion to Suppress Identifications [Doc. 90] and GRANTS the Government's Motion to Dismiss Count Seven [Doc. 101] as to Defendant Rojas-Coyotl.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
