U.S. v. ARRIOZA-MELENDEZ, 1:13-CR-385-JEC. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20140620b76
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2014
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY 1 LINDA T. WALKER, Magistrate Judge. The Defendant, Jose Edgardo Arrioza-Melendez ("Defendant"), by consent, has appeared before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge and has entered a plea ofguilty to the Indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I have determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the plea to the offense charged
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY 1 LINDA T. WALKER, Magistrate Judge. The Defendant, Jose Edgardo Arrioza-Melendez ("Defendant"), by consent, has appeared before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge and has entered a plea ofguilty to the Indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I have determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the plea to the offense charged i..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY1
LINDA T. WALKER, Magistrate Judge.
The Defendant, Jose Edgardo Arrioza-Melendez ("Defendant"), by consent, has appeared before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge and has entered a plea ofguilty to the Indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I have determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the plea to the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact establishing each of the essential elements of the offense.
It is, therefore, RECOMMENDED that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.
IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.
FootNotes
1. Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS after service of a copy: of this Report and Recommendation shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).
Source: Leagle