U.S. v. CROWDER, 2:14-CR-053-WCO-JCF. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20141205895
Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 04, 2014
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY 1 J. CLAY FULLER, Magistrate Judge. The defendant, Misti Crowder, by consent, has appeared before the undersigned and has entered a plea of guilty to COUNT ONE of the Information. After cautioning and examining the defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, the undersigned has determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the plea to the offense charged is supported by an independe
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY 1 J. CLAY FULLER, Magistrate Judge. The defendant, Misti Crowder, by consent, has appeared before the undersigned and has entered a plea of guilty to COUNT ONE of the Information. After cautioning and examining the defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, the undersigned has determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the plea to the offense charged is supported by an independen..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY1
J. CLAY FULLER, Magistrate Judge.
The defendant, Misti Crowder, by consent, has appeared before the undersigned and has entered a plea of guilty to COUNT ONE of the Information. After cautioning and examining the defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, the undersigned has determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the plea to the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact establishing each of the essential elements of such offense. The undersigned also determined that the defendant voluntarily and expressly waived the right to appeal her conviction and sentence and the right to collaterally attack her conviction and sentence in any post-conviction proceeding (including, but not limited to, motions filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on any ground, except that the defendant may file a direct appeal of an upward departure or upward variance above the sentencing guideline range as calculated by the District Court, or if the Government initiates a direct appeal of the sentence imposed, the defendant may file a cross-appeal of that same sentence. Furthermore, claims that the defendant's counsel rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance are also exempt from the waiver. The undersigned therefore RECOMMENDS that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within 14 DAYS after service of a copy of this Report and Recommendation shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such report and recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b(1)(B).
Source: Leagle