U.S. v. Gbenedio, 1:17-CR-430-TWT. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20190520721
Visitors: 14
Filed: May 16, 2019
Latest Update: May 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, JR. , District Judge . This is a criminal action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 72] of the Magistrate Judge recommending denying the Defendant's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 50]. The Government installed a pole camera that recorded the exterior of the Defendant's pharmacy and what little could be seen through the front windows of the establishment. The Defendant had no expectation of privacy as to the exterior of the pharmacy. The Court ap
Summary: ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, JR. , District Judge . This is a criminal action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 72] of the Magistrate Judge recommending denying the Defendant's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 50]. The Government installed a pole camera that recorded the exterior of the Defendant's pharmacy and what little could be seen through the front windows of the establishment. The Defendant had no expectation of privacy as to the exterior of the pharmacy. The Court app..
More
ORDER
THOMAS W. THRASH, JR., District Judge.
This is a criminal action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 72] of the Magistrate Judge recommending denying the Defendant's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 50]. The Government installed a pole camera that recorded the exterior of the Defendant's pharmacy and what little could be seen through the front windows of the establishment. The Defendant had no expectation of privacy as to the exterior of the pharmacy. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. The Defendant's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 50] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
