Ingram Micro, Inc. v. Mindful Ecycling LLC, 1:17-CV-02549-CC. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20191219a64
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2019
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER CLARENCE COOPER , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Ingram Micro, Inc.'s ("Ingram Micro") Third Motion in Limine to Bar Evidence and Testimony Regarding Ingram Micro's Ownership. The Court, being duly advised on the premises, now GRANTS said Motion. The Court finds that any evidence or testimony concerning or related to the evidence demonstrating that Ingram Micro was acquired by a Chinese corporation, as well as Ingra
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER CLARENCE COOPER , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Ingram Micro, Inc.'s ("Ingram Micro") Third Motion in Limine to Bar Evidence and Testimony Regarding Ingram Micro's Ownership. The Court, being duly advised on the premises, now GRANTS said Motion. The Court finds that any evidence or testimony concerning or related to the evidence demonstrating that Ingram Micro was acquired by a Chinese corporation, as well as Ingram..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
CLARENCE COOPER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Ingram Micro, Inc.'s ("Ingram Micro") Third Motion in Limine to Bar Evidence and Testimony Regarding Ingram Micro's Ownership. The Court, being duly advised on the premises, now GRANTS said Motion.
The Court finds that any evidence or testimony concerning or related to the evidence demonstrating that Ingram Micro was acquired by a Chinese corporation, as well as Ingram Micro's size, wealth, assets, financial position or its ability to pay any judgment obtained by MeC in this case, should be excluded because 1) evidence demonstrating a company to be "foreign" or "Chinese" and 2) evidence indicating the size, wealth and ability to pay an adverse judgment is more prejudicial than probative and due to its irrelevance. The Parties, counsel, and their witnesses may not refer to this evidence in the presence of the jurors or prospective jurors.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
