Ingram Micro, Inc. v. Mindful Ecycling LLC, 1:17-CV-02549-CC. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20191219a67
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2019
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER CLARENCE COOPER , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Ingram Micro, Inc.'s ("Ingram Micro") Sixth Motion in Limine to Bar Evidence and Testimony Regarding Witnesses Named on Mindful eCycling, LLC ("MeC")'s Witness Lists but Not Called at Trial. The Court, being duly advised on the premises, now GRANTS said Motion. The Court finds inadmissible any evidence or testimony concerning or related to the fact that witnesses were
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER CLARENCE COOPER , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Ingram Micro, Inc.'s ("Ingram Micro") Sixth Motion in Limine to Bar Evidence and Testimony Regarding Witnesses Named on Mindful eCycling, LLC ("MeC")'s Witness Lists but Not Called at Trial. The Court, being duly advised on the premises, now GRANTS said Motion. The Court finds inadmissible any evidence or testimony concerning or related to the fact that witnesses were ..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
CLARENCE COOPER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Ingram Micro, Inc.'s ("Ingram Micro") Sixth Motion in Limine to Bar Evidence and Testimony Regarding Witnesses Named on Mindful eCycling, LLC ("MeC")'s Witness Lists but Not Called at Trial. The Court, being duly advised on the premises, now GRANTS said Motion.
The Court finds inadmissible any evidence or testimony concerning or related to the fact that witnesses were named on Ingram Micro's witness list but not called at trial because such references would have little probative value and would be highly unfairly prejudicial to Ingram Micro's case. The Parties, counsel, and their witnesses may not refer to this evidence in the presence of the jurors or prospective jurors.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
