Ingram Micro, Inc. v. Mindful Ecycling LLC, 1:17-CV-02549-CC. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20191219a68
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2019
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER CLARENCE COOPER , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Ingram Micro, Inc.'s ("Ingram Micro") Seventh Motion in Limine to Bar Evidence and Testimony Regarding Previously Undisclosed Fact Witnesses. The Court, being duly advised on the premises, now GRANTS said Motion. The Court finds inadmissible any evidence or testimony concerning or related witnesses not properly or timely disclosed because doing so would prejudice Ingr
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER CLARENCE COOPER , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Ingram Micro, Inc.'s ("Ingram Micro") Seventh Motion in Limine to Bar Evidence and Testimony Regarding Previously Undisclosed Fact Witnesses. The Court, being duly advised on the premises, now GRANTS said Motion. The Court finds inadmissible any evidence or testimony concerning or related witnesses not properly or timely disclosed because doing so would prejudice Ingra..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
CLARENCE COOPER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Ingram Micro, Inc.'s ("Ingram Micro") Seventh Motion in Limine to Bar Evidence and Testimony Regarding Previously Undisclosed Fact Witnesses. The Court, being duly advised on the premises, now GRANTS said Motion.
The Court finds inadmissible any evidence or testimony concerning or related witnesses not properly or timely disclosed because doing so would prejudice Ingram Micro's case. The Parties, counsel, and their witnesses may not refer to this evidence in the presence of the jurors or prospective jurors.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
