United States v. Thomas, 01:18-CR-00036-ELR-JSA. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20191226523
Visitors: 17
Filed: Dec. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER ELEANOR L. ROSS , District Judge . This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. [Doc. 41.] Judge Anand recommends that Defendant's motion to suppress [Doc. 14], motion to dismiss for speedy trial violation [17], motion to dismiss [18] and motion to dismiss [19] be denied. After conducting a careful and complete review of a magistrate judge's findings and recommendations, a district court judge may accep
Summary: ORDER ELEANOR L. ROSS , District Judge . This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. [Doc. 41.] Judge Anand recommends that Defendant's motion to suppress [Doc. 14], motion to dismiss for speedy trial violation [17], motion to dismiss [18] and motion to dismiss [19] be denied. After conducting a careful and complete review of a magistrate judge's findings and recommendations, a district court judge may accept..
More
ORDER
ELEANOR L. ROSS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. [Doc. 41.] Judge Anand recommends that Defendant's motion to suppress [Doc. 14], motion to dismiss for speedy trial violation [17], motion to dismiss [18] and motion to dismiss [19] be denied. After conducting a careful and complete review of a magistrate judge's findings and recommendations, a district court judge may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge's R&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). No objections to the magistrate judge's R&R have been filed, and therefore, the Court has reviewed the R&R for plain error. See United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1095 (11th Cir. 1983). The Court finds no error.
Accordingly the Court ADOPTS the R&R [Doc. 41] as the opinion of this Court. For the reasons stated in the R&R, the Court DENIES Defendant's motion to suppress [Doc. 14], motion to dismiss for speedy trial violation [17], motion to dismiss [18] and motion to dismiss [19].
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
