United States v. Hall, 4:19-cr-0021-WMR. (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20200306c31
Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 05, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2020
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM M. RAY, II , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Non-Final Report and Recommendation ("R & R") [Doc. 58], which recommends that Defendant Hall's Motion to Dismiss Indictment [Doc. 38] be DENIED. No objection to the R & R has been filed. I. LEGAL STANDARD Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the Court reviews the R & R for clear error if no objections are filed by a party within 14 days after being served with a copy. If a party files objection
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM M. RAY, II , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Non-Final Report and Recommendation ("R & R") [Doc. 58], which recommends that Defendant Hall's Motion to Dismiss Indictment [Doc. 38] be DENIED. No objection to the R & R has been filed. I. LEGAL STANDARD Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the Court reviews the R & R for clear error if no objections are filed by a party within 14 days after being served with a copy. If a party files objections..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM M. RAY, II, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Non-Final Report and Recommendation ("R & R") [Doc. 58], which recommends that Defendant Hall's Motion to Dismiss Indictment [Doc. 38] be DENIED. No objection to the R & R has been filed.
I. LEGAL STANDARD
Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court reviews the R & R for clear error if no objections are filed by a party within 14 days after being served with a copy. If a party files objections, however, the Court must determine de novo any part of the R & R that is the subject of a proper objection. Id. As no objection to this R & R has been filed in this case, the clear error standard applies.
II. CONCLUSION
After considering the Non-Final Report and Recommendation [Doc. 58], the Court receives the R & R with approval and adopts its findings and legal conclusions as the Opinion of this Court. Accordingly, Defendant Hall's Motion to Dismiss Indictment [Doc. 38] is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
