BOYCE v. ASTRUE, CV 111-016. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120413720
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2012
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge. After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed (doc. no. 23). 1 Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, the Commissioner's final decision is AFFIRMED, this civil action is CLOSED, and a final judgment shall be ENTERED in favor of the Commissioner. SO ORDERED. Fo
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge. After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed (doc. no. 23). 1 Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, the Commissioner's final decision is AFFIRMED, this civil action is CLOSED, and a final judgment shall be ENTERED in favor of the Commissioner. SO ORDERED. Foo..
More
ORDER
J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge.
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed (doc. no. 23).1 Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, the Commissioner's final decision is AFFIRMED, this civil action is CLOSED, and a final judgment shall be ENTERED in favor of the Commissioner.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. In conjunction with his objections, which were filed one day after the deadline, Plaintiff filed a "Motion to File Objections . . . Out of Time." (Doc. no. 22.) Upon consideration, this motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff's objections have been considered in the Court's de novo review of the file.
Source: Leagle
