NIX v. U.S., CV411-160. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120418b33
Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2012
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr., District Judge. Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17), to which objections have been filed (Doc. 22). After a careful de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concurs with the report and recommendation and concludes that Petitioner's objections are without merit. Accordingly, the report and recommendation is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion in this case and Petitioner's 2255 claim is DENIED. The Clerk of Court
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr., District Judge. Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17), to which objections have been filed (Doc. 22). After a careful de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concurs with the report and recommendation and concludes that Petitioner's objections are without merit. Accordingly, the report and recommendation is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion in this case and Petitioner's 2255 claim is DENIED. The Clerk of Court ..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr., District Judge.
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17), to which objections have been filed (Doc. 22). After a careful de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concurs with the report and recommendation and concludes that Petitioner's objections are without merit. Accordingly, the report and recommendation is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion in this case and Petitioner's § 2255 claim is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), an appeal may not be taken in this matter unless the court issues a Certificate of Appealability. This certificate may issue only if the Petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The Court has carefully considered Petitioner's case and finds that he cannot meet the above standard. As a result, any request by Petitioner for leave to appeal in forma pauperis must be DISMISSED AS MOOT.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
