SHAH v. ASTRUE, CV 111-077. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120629a41
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 28, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 28, 2012
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge. After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration in accor
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge. After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration in accord..
More
ORDER
J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge.
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration in accordance with the Court's opinion. In addition, in the event that benefits are awarded on remand, Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of the Social Security closeout letter to file for fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
