Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. BRADLEY, 4:05-cr-59. (2012)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20120723546 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 20, 2012
Summary: ORDER R AVANT EDENFIELD, District Judge. Before the Court is the Substitute Receiver's motion to reconsider. See Doc. 1396. On March 20, 2012, the Substitute Receiver filed his 23rd motion for compensation. See Doc. 1371. On April 25, 2012, the Substitute Receiver filed his 24th motion for compensation. See Doc. 1385. On May 14, 2012, this Court dismissed both motions in light of the Bradleys' appeal. See Doc. 1393. The Substitute Receiver moved the Court to reconsider on May 18, 201
More

ORDER

R AVANT EDENFIELD, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Substitute Receiver's motion to reconsider. See Doc. 1396.

On March 20, 2012, the Substitute Receiver filed his 23rd motion for compensation. See Doc. 1371. On April 25, 2012, the Substitute Receiver filed his 24th motion for compensation. See Doc. 1385. On May 14, 2012, this Court dismissed both motions in light of the Bradleys' appeal. See Doc. 1393. The Substitute Receiver moved the Court to reconsider on May 18, 2012. See Doc. 1396.

This Court subsequently approved the Substitute Receiver's 23rd motion for compensation. See Doc. 1410. Thus, the Court has already granted the Substitute Receiver's motion to reconsider the dismissal of its 23rd motion for compensation.

The Court has not yet taken action on the motion for reconsideration with regards to the 24th motion for compensation. Upon considering the Substitute Receiver's motion and the parties' argument settling the issues remaining in this case, the Court GRANTS the motion to reconsider. See Docs. 1413 at 2; 1427.

CONCLUSION

The Substitute Receiver's request for this Court to address the motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. See Doc. 1433. The Court has already granted the Substitute Receiver's motion to reconsider the dismissal of the 23rd motion for compensation. See Doc. 1410. The Court now GRANTS the same with regards to the 24th motion. See Doc. 1396.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer