HOLMES v. DALRYMPLE, CV 312-099. (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20130531c50
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 30, 2013
Latest Update: May 30, 2013
Summary: ORDER W. LEON BARFIELD, District Judge. After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed (doe. no. 41). Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Defendant Morales' motion to dismiss is GRANTED (doc. no. 25), Defendant Morales' motion to stay is denied as MOOT (doc. no. 26), Plaintiff's motion to amend his r
Summary: ORDER W. LEON BARFIELD, District Judge. After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed (doe. no. 41). Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Defendant Morales' motion to dismiss is GRANTED (doc. no. 25), Defendant Morales' motion to stay is denied as MOOT (doc. no. 26), Plaintiff's motion to amend his re..
More
ORDER
W. LEON BARFIELD, District Judge.
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed (doe. no. 41). Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Defendant Morales' motion to dismiss is GRANTED (doc. no. 25), Defendant Morales' motion to stay is denied as MOOT (doc. no. 26), Plaintiff's motion to amend his response and his motion to dismiss Defendant Morales' motion to dismiss is denied as MOOT (doe. nos. 30, 32), Plaintiff's retaliation claim against Defendant Morales is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Defendant Morales is DISMISSED from this action.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
