U.S. v. HOOKS, CV613-060. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20140423a12
Visitors: 23
Filed: Apr. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER G. R. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. In their Joint Motion to Extend Discovery, counsel for the parties "agree" that there is good cause for the extension, but they fail to furnish any information that would permit the Court to make its own assessment of their diligence in conducting discovery. Nor do they make any effort to explain why they need an additional 60 days rather than, say, 30 or 45 days. Something more than this is required under the rules. The parties have 14 days to supplement
Summary: ORDER G. R. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. In their Joint Motion to Extend Discovery, counsel for the parties "agree" that there is good cause for the extension, but they fail to furnish any information that would permit the Court to make its own assessment of their diligence in conducting discovery. Nor do they make any effort to explain why they need an additional 60 days rather than, say, 30 or 45 days. Something more than this is required under the rules. The parties have 14 days to supplement t..
More
ORDER
G. R. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
In their Joint Motion to Extend Discovery, counsel for the parties "agree" that there is good cause for the extension, but they fail to furnish any information that would permit the Court to make its own assessment of their diligence in conducting discovery. Nor do they make any effort to explain why they need an additional 60 days rather than, say, 30 or 45 days. Something more than this is required under the rules. The parties have 14 days to supplement their motion.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
