ARMSTRONG v. OCWEN MORTGAGE COMPANY, CV413-010. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20140815l85
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2014
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr., District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Consent Motion Extending Time for Plaintiffs to Deposit Money into the Registry of the Court. (Doc. 43.) However, the Court understands that the funds in question have since been deposited in the registry of the Court without objection by Defendants. (Doc. 45.) Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion is DISMISSED AS MOOT. Also before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Stay (Doc. 44) pending the Court's ruling on Defendants
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr., District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Consent Motion Extending Time for Plaintiffs to Deposit Money into the Registry of the Court. (Doc. 43.) However, the Court understands that the funds in question have since been deposited in the registry of the Court without objection by Defendants. (Doc. 45.) Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion is DISMISSED AS MOOT. Also before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Stay (Doc. 44) pending the Court's ruling on Defendants'..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr., District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Consent Motion Extending Time for Plaintiffs to Deposit Money into the Registry of the Court. (Doc. 43.) However, the Court understands that the funds in question have since been deposited in the registry of the Court without objection by Defendants. (Doc. 45.) Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion is DISMISSED AS MOOT. Also before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Stay (Doc. 44) pending the Court's ruling on Defendants' earlier motion to dismiss. On March 28, 2014, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendant's motion to dismiss. (Doc. 55.) Accordingly, Defendant's motion to stay is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
