LACHANCE v. COLVIN, CV113-154. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20140818b22
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2014
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge. After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion. Therefore, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Court REVERSES the Acting Commissioner's final decision and REMANDS this case to the Acting Commissioner for further consideration
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge. After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion. Therefore, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Court REVERSES the Acting Commissioner's final decision and REMANDS this case to the Acting Commissioner for further consideration ..
More
ORDER
J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge.
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion. Therefore, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Court REVERSES the Acting Commissioner's final decision and REMANDS this case to the Acting Commissioner for further consideration in accordance with the Court's opinion.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
