Filed: Aug. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2014
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr., District Judge. Before the Court are five motions for summary judgment filed by Defendant CenterPoint Garden City, LLC (Doc. 80), Third-Party Defendant Evans General Contractors, Inc. (Doc. 78), Third-Party Defendant Pruitt Eberly Stone, Inc. (Doc. 71), Third-Party Defendant Macgregor Associates Architects, Inc. (Doc. 79), and Fourth-Party Defendant Danko Concrete Construction, LLC (Doc. 75) . On December 30, 2013, after each of these motions was filed, Plaintiff
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr., District Judge. Before the Court are five motions for summary judgment filed by Defendant CenterPoint Garden City, LLC (Doc. 80), Third-Party Defendant Evans General Contractors, Inc. (Doc. 78), Third-Party Defendant Pruitt Eberly Stone, Inc. (Doc. 71), Third-Party Defendant Macgregor Associates Architects, Inc. (Doc. 79), and Fourth-Party Defendant Danko Concrete Construction, LLC (Doc. 75) . On December 30, 2013, after each of these motions was filed, Plaintiff f..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr., District Judge.
Before the Court are five motions for summary judgment filed by Defendant CenterPoint Garden City, LLC (Doc. 80), Third-Party Defendant Evans General Contractors, Inc. (Doc. 78), Third-Party Defendant Pruitt Eberly Stone, Inc. (Doc. 71), Third-Party Defendant Macgregor Associates Architects, Inc. (Doc. 79), and Fourth-Party Defendant Danko Concrete Construction, LLC (Doc. 75) . On December 30, 2013, after each of these motions was filed, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint with leave from the Court. (Doc. 90.) No responses were ever filed.1
The Court, therefore, ORDERS that all parties SHALL submit within fourteen days their amended motions for summary judgment to reflect Plaintiff's amended complaint. All parties should be aware, however, that the Court will not accept any motion or response that incorporates by reference any factual allegation or argument contained in an earlier filing. Each motion and response should be a stand-alone filing that independently contains all the factual allegations and arguments that the filing party wishes the Court to consider. All parties' previous motions for summary judgment (Docs. 71, 75, 78, 79, and 80) are DISMISSED AS MOOT.
SO ORDERED.
