BOURSHESKI v. COLVIN, CV 314-009. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20141015901
Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2014
Summary: ORDER DUDLEY H. BOWEN, District Judge. Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social. Security actions under sentence four of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and in light of the government's request, with consent from Plaintiff, to remand this action for further agency action, IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is hereby reversed under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) wit
Summary: ORDER DUDLEY H. BOWEN, District Judge. Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social. Security actions under sentence four of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and in light of the government's request, with consent from Plaintiff, to remand this action for further agency action, IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is hereby reversed under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) with..
More
ORDER
DUDLEY H. BOWEN, District Judge.
Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social. Security actions under sentence four of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the government's request, with consent from Plaintiff, to remand this action for further agency action, IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is hereby reversed under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner for further proceedings.
Upon remand, the ALJ shall (1) obtain additional evidence concerning Plaintiff's mental impairments to complete the administrative record, including, if warranted, consultative mental status examinations with psychological testing and medical source statements about what she can still do despite her impairments; (2) adjudicate the entire period at issue with consideration to Plaintiff's date last insured of June 30, 2009; (3) reevaluate Plaintiff's fibromyalgia under Social Security Rulings 12-2p and 14-1p; (4) evaluate evidence of record concerning Plaintiff's cognitive function; (5) reassess Plaintiff's RFC; (6) reevaluate all medical evidence of record; (7) if required by agency policy, hold a supplemental hearing; (8) obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert; and (9) conduct any other proceedings the Commissioner deems necessary. The Clerk of Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
ORDER ENTERED
Source: Leagle