Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. COKER, CR 108-062. (2014)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20141124972 Visitors: 10
Filed: Nov. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2014
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge. Defendant has filed two motions for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) on the basis that Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines has revised the guidelines applicable to drug trafficking offenses. Even though Amendment 782 became effective on November 1, 2014, no defendant may be released on the basis of the retroactive amendment before November 1, 2015. See U.S.S.G. Amend. 788. Thus, the Court will undertake a review of
More

ORDER

J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge.

Defendant has filed two motions for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) on the basis that Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines has revised the guidelines applicable to drug trafficking offenses. Even though Amendment 782 became effective on November 1, 2014, no defendant may be released on the basis of the retroactive amendment before November 1, 2015. See U.S.S.G. Amend. 788. Thus, the Court will undertake a review of cases involving drug trafficking offenses in due course. If Defendant is entitled to a sentence reduction as a result of amendments to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, the Court will make such a reduction sua sponte. Accordingly, Defendant's motions (doc. nos. 543, 544) are DEFERRED.1

ORDER ENTERED.

FootNotes


1. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion for administrative purposes.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer