Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HUNTER v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION, CV 314-035. (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20150330999 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER BRIAN K. EPPS , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff's motion for Rule 26(f) meeting. (Doc. no. 38.) Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B) specifically exempts prisoner suits from the requirement of holding a Rule 26(f) conference, and a scheduling order with the discovery deadlines has already been sent to Plaintiff in this case. (Doc. no. 25) Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion for Rule 26(f) meeting. (Doc. no. 38.) SO ORDERED.

ORDER

Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff's motion for Rule 26(f) meeting. (Doc. no. 38.) Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B) specifically exempts prisoner suits from the requirement of holding a Rule 26(f) conference, and a scheduling order with the discovery deadlines has already been sent to Plaintiff in this case. (Doc. no. 25) Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion for Rule 26(f) meeting. (Doc. no. 38.)

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer