Filed: May 28, 2015
Latest Update: May 28, 2015
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , District Judge . Presently before the Court is the parties' 1 fourth request to continue the stay first, imposed on July 2, 2014. (Docs. 33, 42.) On October 7, 2014, December 16, 2014, and February 19, 2015, this Court granted two sixty-day extensions (docs. 37, 39) and a ninety-day extension (doc. 41) to allow the parties to complete the drafting of the settlement documents and seek the requisite approval from the bankruptcy court, all settling parties, and the appr
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , District Judge . Presently before the Court is the parties' 1 fourth request to continue the stay first, imposed on July 2, 2014. (Docs. 33, 42.) On October 7, 2014, December 16, 2014, and February 19, 2015, this Court granted two sixty-day extensions (docs. 37, 39) and a ninety-day extension (doc. 41) to allow the parties to complete the drafting of the settlement documents and seek the requisite approval from the bankruptcy court, all settling parties, and the appro..
More
ORDER
J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the parties'1 fourth request to continue the stay first, imposed on July 2, 2014. (Docs. 33, 42.) On October 7, 2014, December 16, 2014, and February 19, 2015, this Court granted two sixty-day extensions (docs. 37, 39) and a ninety-day extension (doc. 41) to allow the parties to complete the drafting of the settlement documents and seek the requisite approval from the bankruptcy court, all settling parties, and the appropriate officials within the federal government. With their February request, the parties sought to continue the stay for an additional 90 days to allow the bankruptcy court to approve Defendant Saraland's obligations under the Administrative Order on Consent, and to allow the parties to reach an agreement on draft consent decree language. The parties now represent that the bankruptcy court has approved the Administrative Order on Consent but that the parties need additional time to negotiate the terms of the consent decree.
Having reviewed the motion, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART the parties' request. (Doc. 42.) This matter shall be STAYED an additional SIXTY DAYS from the date of this Order, at which time the parties shall file a status report with the Court. The parties are ADVISED that any additional request for extension of the stay will result in a status conference before the Court.
ORDER.
