SNEED v. HAE, CV 314-085. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20150717a00
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER BRIAN K. EPPS , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, an inmate incarcerated at Wheeler Correctional Facility in Alamo, Georgia, commenced the above-captioned case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On June 30, three of the four remaining defendants answered Plaintiff's complaint and a scheduling notice was sent out setting the deadlines in this case. ( See doc. nos. 32, 33.) Because the current scheduling notice was entered in error, the Court VACATES the scheduling notice. (Doc. no. 33.) A ne
Summary: ORDER BRIAN K. EPPS , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, an inmate incarcerated at Wheeler Correctional Facility in Alamo, Georgia, commenced the above-captioned case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On June 30, three of the four remaining defendants answered Plaintiff's complaint and a scheduling notice was sent out setting the deadlines in this case. ( See doc. nos. 32, 33.) Because the current scheduling notice was entered in error, the Court VACATES the scheduling notice. (Doc. no. 33.) A new..
More
ORDER
BRIAN K. EPPS, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, an inmate incarcerated at Wheeler Correctional Facility in Alamo, Georgia, commenced the above-captioned case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 30, three of the four remaining defendants answered Plaintiff's complaint and a scheduling notice was sent out setting the deadlines in this case. (See doc. nos. 32, 33.) Because the current scheduling notice was entered in error, the Court VACATES the scheduling notice. (Doc. no. 33.) A new scheduling notice setting the deadlines will be entered upon appearance of the current unserved defendant.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
