ORDER

WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr., District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Chad Fitzgerald McCoy's Motion Seeking Sentence Credit Nunc Pro Tunc, in which Defendant seeks credit against his federal sentence for time he spent in state custody. (Doc. 773 at 2.) Defendant contends that "both [the] federal sentencing court and his state court expressed their desire for concurrent sentences." (Id.) While the Court recommended that Defendant receive credit against his federal sentence for all time served since entering into federal custody on February 4, 2013, Defendant received credit against his state sentence for that time. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b), a defendant does not receive credit against his federal sentence for time spent in custody where that time was also credited against another sentence.1 As a result, the Bureau of Prisons ("SOP") did not honor the Court's recommendation because doing so would have run contrary to the express statutory language of § 3585(b). The Court can only recommend a defendant receive credit for time spent in federal custody: the SOP ultimately determines whether a defendant should receive credit. See United States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329 (1992) (holding that BOP determines credit issues, not district courts); United States v. Pineyro, 112 F.3d 43, 45 (2d Cir. 1997) (recognizing federal courts lack authority under § 3585 to order BOP to award credit). Accordingly, Defendant's motion must be DENIED.2

SO ORDERED.