MOBLEY v. LANGLAIS, CV415-226. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20150921a29
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER G.R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . On September 11, 2015, pro se plaintiff Daisy Mobley filed a "Proposed Continuance of Above Civil Action." Doc. 13. It's not entirely clear what she wants, but out of an abundance of caution the Court construes the filing as a motion for extension of time to respond to defendants' motion to dismiss (doe. 4) (filed September 3, 2015). Mobley states that an "[ejxtension [dleadline of September 4, 2015" has now been met (no such deadline ever existed),
Summary: ORDER G.R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . On September 11, 2015, pro se plaintiff Daisy Mobley filed a "Proposed Continuance of Above Civil Action." Doc. 13. It's not entirely clear what she wants, but out of an abundance of caution the Court construes the filing as a motion for extension of time to respond to defendants' motion to dismiss (doe. 4) (filed September 3, 2015). Mobley states that an "[ejxtension [dleadline of September 4, 2015" has now been met (no such deadline ever existed), ..
More
ORDER
G.R. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
On September 11, 2015, pro se plaintiff Daisy Mobley filed a "Proposed Continuance of Above Civil Action." Doc. 13. It's not entirely clear what she wants, but out of an abundance of caution the Court construes the filing as a motion for extension of time to respond to defendants' motion to dismiss (doe. 4) (filed September 3, 2015).
Mobley states that an "[ejxtension [dleadline of September 4, 2015" has now been met (no such deadline ever existed), and thus that "it is time to move forward with above Civil Action." Doc. 13 at 1. "With the hopeful approval of the appointed, Judge William T. Moore Jr.," she then reveals her "intent to continue fourth [sic] still stand, as findings, and summary of this case is forth coming within a week." Id.
Construing that "hopeful approval" and "intent to continue" as a request for a September 18, 2015 response deadline (one week from the day Mobley filed her proposed continuance), the Court DENIES AS MOOT her construed motion since the original September 21, 2015 deadline exceeds the requested extension.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Plaintiff named "Marc Jacobs," and "Coty Industries," but defendants have since clarified that "Marc Jacobs International," and "Coty, Inc.," are their proper names. Doc. 7 at 1. The Clerk therefore is DIRECTED to amend the docket caption accordingly, and all subsequent filings shall conform.
Source: Leagle
