KELLEY v. STAFF ZONE, INC., CV414-282. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20151015962
Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 14, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION G. R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . Over two months ago, the Court ordered plaintiff Ronald Kelley to amend his complaint and correct a multitude of pleading deficiencies, chief of which is a complete lack of facts. Doe. 12. He has failed to comply, so his case should be dismissed without prejudice. See L.R. 41(b); see Taylor v. Augusta-Richmond Cnty. Consol. Comm'rs, 2015 WL 5827444 at * 1 (11th Cir. Oct. 7, 2015) (affirming dismissal without prejudice under Loc
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION G. R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . Over two months ago, the Court ordered plaintiff Ronald Kelley to amend his complaint and correct a multitude of pleading deficiencies, chief of which is a complete lack of facts. Doe. 12. He has failed to comply, so his case should be dismissed without prejudice. See L.R. 41(b); see Taylor v. Augusta-Richmond Cnty. Consol. Comm'rs, 2015 WL 5827444 at * 1 (11th Cir. Oct. 7, 2015) (affirming dismissal without prejudice under Loca..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
G. R. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
Over two months ago, the Court ordered plaintiff Ronald Kelley to amend his complaint and correct a multitude of pleading deficiencies, chief of which is a complete lack of facts. Doe. 12. He has failed to comply, so his case should be dismissed without prejudice. See L.R. 41(b); see Taylor v. Augusta-Richmond Cnty. Consol. Comm'rs, 2015 WL 5827444 at * 1 (11th Cir. Oct. 7, 2015) (affirming dismissal without prejudice under Local Rule 41.1(b) for failure to comply with this Court's order requiring pro se plaintiff to respond to a motion to dismiss); Betty K Agencies, Ltd. v. MY Monada, 432 F.3d 1333-1337 (11th Cir. 2005) (district courts may sua sponte dismiss an action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) if the plaintiff fails to comply with court rules or a court order); Donaldson v. Clark, 819 F.2d 1551, 1557 n. 6 (11th Cir.1987) (district court has inherent authority to sanction parties for "violations of procedural rules or court orders," up to and including dismissals with prejudice).
SO REPORTED AND RECOMMENDED.
Source: Leagle
