Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ROLLINS v. PEPSICO, INC., 1:15-cv-156. (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20151102980 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2015
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , District Judge . Presently before the Court is the parties' consent motion to dismiss without prejudice. (Doc. 6). In their motion, the parties indicate that "`PEPSICO, INC. a/k/a Bottling Group, LLC or Bottling Group, Holdings, Inc.,' and other unnamed entities in the complaint . . . are improper parties." ( Id. ). Accordingly, the parties have agreed to voluntarily dismiss these improper parties. ( Id. ). This leaves Defendant New Bern Transport Corp. as the sole re
More

ORDER

Presently before the Court is the parties' consent motion to dismiss without prejudice. (Doc. 6). In their motion, the parties indicate that "`PEPSICO, INC. a/k/a Bottling Group, LLC or Bottling Group, Holdings, Inc.,' and other unnamed entities in the complaint . . . are improper parties." (Id.). Accordingly, the parties have agreed to voluntarily dismiss these improper parties. (Id.). This leaves Defendant New Bern Transport Corp. as the sole remaining defendant in this case.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) (i) (A) (ii), the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE all claims against Defendants Pepsico, Inc. a/k/a Bottling Group, LLC or Bottling Group, Holdings, Inc., and other unnamed entities in the complaint. The Clerk SHALL TERMINATE Pepsico, Inc. a/k/a Bottling Group, LLC or Bottling Group, Holdings, Inc., and other unnamed entities as defendants in this action and terminate all deadlines and motions pertaining to these parties. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees. The sole remaining defendant shall be New Bern Transport Corp.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer