Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. STEVENSON, CR 108-061. (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20151119d46 Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , District Judge . On November 17, 2015, the Court received a request, now construed as a motion, seeking the release of Defendant Calvin Lee Stevenson, Jr.'s Presentence Investigation Report ("PSI") to the Clemency Project 2014. This motion was filed by Cynthia W. Roseberry, who is appearing pro bono on behalf of Defendant. After careful consideration, the motion is GRANTED and the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") is authorized to release Defendant's PSI to counsel repres
More

ORDER

On November 17, 2015, the Court received a request, now construed as a motion, seeking the release of Defendant Calvin Lee Stevenson, Jr.'s Presentence Investigation Report ("PSI") to the Clemency Project 2014. This motion was filed by Cynthia W. Roseberry, who is appearing pro bono on behalf of Defendant. After careful consideration, the motion is GRANTED and the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") is authorized to release Defendant's PSI to counsel representing Defendant as part of the Clemency Project 2014. Counsel shall fully comply with the BOP policy for releasing Presentence Reports to Clemency Project 2014 attorneys:

(1) use of the PSI shall be exclusively for counsel's representation of Defendant in connection with the Clemency Project 2014; (2) disclosure of the PSI may occur only with the permission of Defendant and only to members of the Clemency Project 2014's screening and steering committees who have executed nondisclosure agreements, and to the Office of the Pardon Attorney as a required attachment to any petition for clemency; (g) further disclosure of the PSI to any other individual is strictly forbidden; (4) disclosure of the PSI to an inmate in the custody of the BOP is not permitted under any circumstances; and (5) destruction of the PSI shall occur immediately following the conclusion of counsel's representation.

Any failure to strictly comply with these restrictions may subject counsel to discipline from this Court.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer